The Other School of Economics

Joe Biden introduces Socratic questioning into the Situation Room

joebiden

Joe Biden had a question.

During a long Sunday meeting with President Obama and top national-security advisers on Sept. 13, the VP interjected,

“Can I just clarify a factual point? How much will we spend this year on Afghanistan?”

Someone provided the figure: $65 billion.

“And how much will we spend on Pakistan?” Another figure was supplied: $2.25 billion.

“Well, by my calculations that’s a 30-to-1 ratio in favour of Afghanistan. So I have a question. Al Qaeda is almost all in Pakistan, and Pakistan has nuclear weapons. And yet for every dollar we’re spending in Pakistan, we’re spending $30 in Afghanistan. Does that make strategic sense?”

The White House Situation Room fell silent. But the questions had their desired effect: those gathered began putting more thought into Pakistan as the key theatre in the region.

This story was reported by Newsweek and the Economist


situation-room

To be read with this column by ERIC MARGOLIS published in the Toronto Sun

http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/eric_margolis/2009/10/11/11369636-sun.html
and
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/10/11-4#comments

Truth is war’s first casualty. The Afghan war’s biggest untruth is, “we’ve got to fight terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them at home.”
Many North Americans still buy this lie because they believe the 9/11 attacks came directly from the Afghanistan-based al-Qaida and Taliban movements.
False. The 9/11 attacks were planned in Germany and Spain, and conducted mainly by U.S.-based Saudis to punish America for supporting Israel.
Taliban, a militant religious, anti-Communist movement of Pashtun tribesmen, was totally surprised by 9/11. Taliban received U.S. aid until May, 2001.Al-Qaida only numbered 300 members. Most have been killed. A handful escaped to Pakistan. Only a few remain in Afghanistan. Yet President Barack Obama insists 68,000 or more U.S. troops must stay in Afghanistan to fight al-Qaida and prevent extremists from re-acquiring “terrorist training camps.”Today, half of Afghanistan is under Taliban control. Anti-American militants could more easily use Somalia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, North and West Africa, or Sudan. They don’t need remote Afghanistan.The 9/11 attacks were planned in apartments, not camps.However backwards and oafish those Pashtun tribesmen, they have no desire or interest in attacking America.Taliban are the sons of the U.S.-backed mujahidin who defeated the Soviets in the 1980s. As I have been saying since 9/11, Taliban never was America’s enemy. Instead of invading Afghanistan in 2001, the U.S. should have paid Taliban to uproot al-Qaida.We are not changing the way Afghans treat their women by waging war on them, or bring democracy through rigged elections.
Taliban, a militant religious, anti-Communist movement of Pashtun tribesmen, was totally surprised by 9/11. Taliban received U.S. aid until May, 2001.
Al-Qaida only numbered 300 members. Most have been killed. A handful escaped to Pakistan. Only a few remain in Afghanistan. Yet President Barack Obama insists 68,000 or more U.S. troops must stay in Afghanistan to fight al-Qaida and prevent extremists from re-acquiring “terrorist training camps.”
Today, half of Afghanistan is under Taliban control. Anti-American militants could more easily use Somalia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, North and West Africa, or Sudan. They don’t need remote Afghanistan.
The 9/11 attacks were planned in apartments, not camps.
However backwards and oafish those Pashtun tribesmen, they have no desire or interest in attacking America.
Taliban are the sons of the U.S.-backed mujahidin who defeated the Soviets in the 1980s. As I have been saying since 9/11, Taliban never was America’s enemy. Instead of invading Afghanistan in 2001, the U.S. should have paid Taliban to uproot al-Qaida.
We are not changing the way Afghans treat their women by waging war on them, or bring democracy through rigged elections.

Some brief notes and inconvenient truths to stir things up a bit. Quite rare in mainstream English speaking media:

Truth is war’s first casualty. The Afghan war’s biggest untruth is, “we’ve got to fight terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them at home.”

Many North Americans still buy this lie because they believe the 9/11 attacks came directly from the Afghanistan-based al-Qaida and Taliban movements.

False. The 9/11 attacks were planned in Germany and Spain, and conducted mainly by U.S.-based Saudis to punish America for supporting Israel.

Taliban, a militant religious, anti-Communist movement of Pashtun tribesmen, was totally surprised by 9/11. Taliban received U.S. aid until May, 2001.Al-Qaida only numbered 300 members. Most have been killed. A handful escaped to Pakistan. Only a few remain in Afghanistan. Yet President Barack Obama insists 68,000 or more U.S. troops must stay in Afghanistan to fight al-Qaida and prevent extremists from re-acquiring “terrorist training camps.”Today, half of Afghanistan is under Taliban control. Anti-American militants could more easily use Somalia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, North and West Africa, or Sudan. They don’t need remote Afghanistan.The 9/11 attacks were planned in apartments, not camps.However backwards and oafish those Pashtun tribesmen, they have no desire or interest in attacking America.Taliban are the sons of the U.S.-backed mujahidin who defeated the Soviets in the 1980s. As I have been saying since 9/11, Taliban never was America’s enemy. Instead of invading Afghanistan in 2001, the U.S. should have paid Taliban to uproot al-Qaida.We are not changing the way Afghans treat their women by waging war on them, or bring democracy through rigged elections.

Taliban, a militant religious, anti-Communist movement of Pashtun tribesmen, was totally surprised by 9/11. Taliban received U.S. aid until May, 2001.

Al-Qaida only numbered 300 members. Most have been killed. A handful escaped to Pakistan. Only a few remain in Afghanistan. Yet President Barack Obama insists 68,000 or more U.S. troops must stay in Afghanistan to fight al-Qaida and prevent extremists from re-acquiring “terrorist training camps.”

Today, half of Afghanistan is under Taliban control. Anti-American militants could more easily use Somalia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, North and West Africa, or Sudan. They don’t need remote Afghanistan.

The 9/11 attacks were planned in apartments, not camps.

However backwards and oafish those Pashtun tribesmen, they have no desire or interest in attacking America.

Taliban are the sons of the U.S.-backed mujahidin who defeated the Soviets in the 1980s. As I have been saying since 9/11, Taliban never was America’s enemy. Instead of invading Afghanistan in 2001, the U.S. should have paid Taliban to uproot al-Qaida.

Unfortunately we are not changing the way Afghans treat their women by waging war on them, or bring democracy through rigged elections.

Disseminate:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Identi.ca
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Wikio
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

1 Comment

Leave a Reply




  • Inspirers

  • .

  • .

  • Brad Fidler

  • fidler-ism

    http://fidler.bol.ucla.edu/
    http://blog.bradfidler.net/

    Best summarized by this line:
    "A serendipitous juxtaposition, for those who know Brad and for those who should get know him, an intrepid explorer of the spaces between pharmaceuticals, networks, Chinese culture, economics and philosophy."

  • Paul Krugman

  • RSS Paul Krugman

  • New Matilda

  • RSS Front page feed

    • Bob Brown Joins Battle To Save Sarawak May 25, 2013
      Former Greens leader Bob Brown has joined activists in Sarawak to protest the development of hydroelectric dams which will displace thousands of indigenous people, reports Jenny Denton […]
    • Cuts To Justice End Up Costing Us May 25, 2013
      Access to justice is the bedrock of our legal system. So why were Legal Aid, community legal centres and human rights education shortchanged in the budget yet again, asks Adam McBeth […]
    • The Numbers! The Numbers! May 25, 2013
      What a disaster budget! Everyone's unhappy, but none more so than old Joe Hockey. Why's he so cross? Take Alan Austin's latest quiz and find out […]
    • Just Who Is Playing Politics With Treasury? May 25, 2013
      Joe Hockey thinks Treasury's budget figures are 'Wayne Swan’s numbers'. Attacks on public servants are not new but this recent talk about a politicised Treasury is nonsense, writes Ben Eltham […]
    • The Asian Century Is Built On Broadband May 25, 2013
      In Asia, high-speed fibre broadband is seen as an enabler, not an expensive drain on the public purse. Gabrielle Jackson compares the top networks in the region […]
    • How Whitlam Managed The Miners May 25, 2013
      When it comes to resources policy, critics love to liken Gillard's approach to Whitlam's. It's politically effective – but it's wrong, writes Sarah Burnside […]
    • The Fragrant Goodness Of St Kevin May 25, 2013
      Kevin Rudd has shown us his true colours, and those colours are a beautiful rainbow. Ben Pobjie gets real about the courage of St Kev […]
    • Can You Trust The Facts? May 25, 2013
      When did the pre-occupation with fact checking arise? When audiences stopped trusting mainstream media. Even expert-sanctioned truths need some scrutiny, writes Jeff Sparrow […]
  • the Australia Institute

  • Books & Ideas

  • RSS Books & Ideas

    • Rhythms of Construction May 25, 2013
      Almost twenty years ago, Christian de Portzamparc was the first French architect to receive the Pritzker Prize. Today his Atelier, located in Paris, is more dynamic than ever, with ambitious projects like the Cidade das Artes in Rio, or the participation in the Grand Paris project. The following interview shows an architect urbanist whose work is geared towa […]
    • Zomia, Land Without State May 25, 2013
      For two thousand years, according to James Scott, the mountains of Zomia were a place of refuge for the people of Southeast Asia. For the author, this region, as a centre of resistance to the state, holds up a mirror to our destructive and self-confident civilisation. A fascinating and intriguing anarchist history. - Reviews / anarchisme, résistance, democra […]
    • A World Out of Key May 25, 2013
      Although today's world is more interdependent than ever, it is still a jigsaw puzzle of sovereign states. One consequence of globalization is that we have to update our own mental maps, and to understand other people's. In this interview, the diplomat and geographer Michel Foucher explains the world's new geography. - Reviews / géographie, int […]
    • The Multiple Meanings of Revolution May 25, 2013
      Though the age of historic upheavals and major political crises seemed to be over, the word “revolution” has made a recent comeback in Georgia, in the Ukraine and in the “Arab Springs” of 2011. Should we revise the concept of revolution? What, if anything, do these contemporary revolutions have in common? Can they be compared to the great revolutions of the […]
    • From Bombay to Mumbai May 25, 2013
      Gyan Prakash's most recent book takes us on a journey through Bombay's history, focusing on the myths and fables that have shaped how the city is represented. His ambitious project fails, however, to explain Bombay's transition from a cosmopolitan city to one torn apart by ethnic conflict. - Reviews / city, urbanisme […]